Friday, June 30, 2006

John Kerry and Al Gore are two guys in the same boat

I have to tip my hat to John Kerry as of late. The man has been fighting a fight he can't seem to win in regards to bringing the troops home, but he does it because he knows it's right.

Now he's blogging to save the internet -- a direct slap in the face to the big telecos who would probably love to buy him off.

I was even watching him go toe to toe with Bill O'Reilly with around 3 AM last night. A strong, firm John Kerry that I didn't see on the campaign trail in 2004.

Al Gore of course has been making waves by pushing global warming into the forefront through lectures and now film. One of the many issues close to his heart that fell by the wayside when it really mattered.

Gore and Kerry seem to be stuck in the same boat. Guys with good ideas who backed away from them when the idea of being President crept into their head. They bought into the seemingly popular idea of "moderation" and ended up on the losing end of important races. Gore of course lost key progressive notes to Nader while failing to pick up enough "swing-voters" to make up the difference and Kerry just downright lost in his "George did bad, I promise I'm not as bad" campaign.

It's more than likely that one or both of these men (especially Kerry) will run for president again. If they do, I hope they don't forget the issues that made them get into politics in the first place.

Don't innovate, just penetrate!

The House has passed a bill to step up offshore drilling programs, proving beyond a doubt that oil is societal crack.

Polluted waters, oil spills along our coast line, more oil profits; all apparently justifiable collateral damage so we can keep clogging our roads with Escalades and Navigators.

The short sighted and destructive policy may not make it though. Like concerned fathers, but with land instead of teenage daughters, the two Florida Senators have vowed to filibuster to keep their state from being penetrated. Hopefully they'll stick to their guns.

Briefly Pardon the Comment Moderation

Sorry about the brief interruption of flow in the comment section. For those who haven't noticed, a friend of mine, the Dean of Cincinnati, has had a cyber stalker.

If you haven't been keeping up to date with the latest blog drama, an anonymous commenter has been spamming the blogosphere trying to take the Dean of Cincinnati down.

When I returned home one evening from a brief errand I had 10-15 posts, all the same posts, all over my blog. I had to delete them, because they were the same thing over and over again, and as I did, the anonymous commenter watched me delete them and began reposting in the same places. The only way to stop the spam was comment moderation. I will turn it off when it is safe.

I do apologize. I'm not a fan of comment moderation and I hope it doesn't last long.

A vote for Fitrakis is a vote for Fitrakis

It seemed for a second as if Yossarian had shed the chip on his shoulder in order to speak from the heart for a moment. A rare thing from Democrats. Sadly, it was the same recycled Democratic talking points, but he seemed sincere.

Andrew, Please answer this honestly, Yes or No : Does Bob Fritakas have a real chance of winning?

Please no speeches about if the people would vote with their hearts, or if the cloud was lifted by "The Man" that shadows the brain of the voter or whatever else - Yes or No?

If the answer is yes, than good luck. Truly I mean that. Hell, I'm a democrat and I've worked campaigns where my candidate was 15 points behind, but if we ran a good race and worked hard and it rained only in certain parts of the districts then we would win.

If the answer is no, then you are giving votes to Blackwell and pretty much helping the Republican party in '08.

You don't have to put your answer online. Just be honest with yourself.


Now there are the obvious counter-arguments: It's my vote I can do what I want with it. We live in a representative democracy, shouldn't I cast my vote for someone who will represent me? Democrats don't own progressive votes, especially when they cease to be progressive, and so forth. But we've heard those just like we've heard the tired mantra of Democrats claiming to know best for everyone.

But let's really put this argument to rest. Should I vote for a conservative Democrat who doesn't particularly represent me but has a chance of beating a Republican? Should third party candidates be ignored because they don't "have a chance at winning"?

In order to see if Yossarian is correct in trying to guide our thought under this proposal, we have to see if this method of voting would be effective and useful every time. For this, I am going to create a fake election for discussion:

Satan (R) vs Hitler (D). And of course Bob Fitrakis (G).

Satan, the embodiment of all things evil, and Hitler, one of the worlds most despicable humans, are in a tight race for the governorship of Ohio. Democrats across the country, Daily Kos might even jump on the Hitler bandwagon for this race, are pleading with voters to keep Satan out of office (he wants to instate a dark theological state).

Now the average voter has to step into the voting box and either vote for a figure who wants to capture the souls of all mankind or a person who wants to eliminate "imperfect" sectors of the population. Two bad choices.

Or the novel idea: They could vote for the third party candidate. They could realize that they believe in universal health care, the preservation of the environment, clean elections, and a whole host of other issues that Bob Fitrakis speaks up about daily.

Or they could just vote for Hitler because he's in a major party and "has a chance." Please note that I am not comparing either Blackwell or Strickland to Satan or Hitler, only using a hyperbolic example to illustrate the faulty thinking presented by commenter Yossarian.

It's my assertion that most logical people in this case would abandon whatever party they were a part of and hop on the Fitrakis train. A clear example that picking based on who may win is illogical and perhaps even unethical.

So why is it so hard for a lot of mainstream party supporters to realize that I, or any Fitrakis/Nader/Peirce/whoever, supporters think that it is a waste of a vote and a poor decision to cast a ballot for what we believe to be a bad candidate?

When I vote for Fitrakis this fall I will do so because I feel he is the best candidate. I would hope that every voter uses the same rubric when selecting their own personal choice. I am not part of some secret Republican agenda. I am not a Democrat, or a Republican, and I never have been. I'm merely a person voting for the candidate I think will best represent me.

And after all, isn't that the point of our little experiment in democracy?

The science is in on smoking

Hopefully Smoke Free Ohio will be boosted by the timely release of The Surgeon General's report on smoking. Apparently, second hand smoke is bad for you. Who would have thought it:

"I am here to say the debate is over: the science is clear," Dr. Carmona said at a televised news conference, where he released a report updating the original surgeon general's study of secondhand smoke in 1986. Since then, hundreds of studies have indicated that the harm caused by secondhand smoke is far greater than earlier believed, he said. The report includes these findings:

¶There is no safe level of secondhand smoke, and even brief exposure can cause harm, especially for people suffering from heart or respiratory diseases.

¶For nonsmoking adults, exposure raises the risk of heart disease by 25 percent to 30 percent and of cancer by 20 percent to 30 percent. It accounted for 46,000 premature deaths from heart disease and 3,000 premature deaths from cancer last year.

¶Secondhand smoke is a cause of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, accounting for 430 deaths last year. The risk is elevated for children whose mothers were exposed during pregnancy and for children exposed in their homes after birth.

¶The impact on the health and development of children is more severe than previously thought. "Children are especially vulnerable to the poisons in secondhand smoke," Dr. Carmona said.

¶Efforts to minimize the effect of secondhand smoke by separating smokers and nonsmokers are ineffective, as are ventilation systems in a shared space.

¶While exposure has declined, as many as 60 percent of nonsmokers show biological evidence of encountering secondhand smoke, and 22 percent of children are exposed to secondhand smoke in their homes.


But of course, there are always nay-sayers even when the truth is clear to the most unscientific of the lay people. People who pick out a sentence or two of multi-chapter report and build a house of cards around it. The scientists at RJ Reynolds respectfully disagree, Dr. Surgeon General. An e-mailer sends a tidbit from Democracy Now:

A statement on the RJ Reynolds website reads: ''It seems unlikely that secondhand smoke presents any significant harm to otherwise healthy nonsmoking adults.”


Who are you going to listen to on this issue? The surgeon general? The harsh tingling in your nose and lungs when someone blows smoke in your face? Or the "scientists" of the tobacco industry?

It's truly sad that there are still people arguing about this.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Fitrakis Officially on the Ballot

With only 3 counties officially tallied, Bob Fitrakis has already passed the mark of 5000 signatures with 5927 certified thus far. Still 85 counties left to count too!

Now that he's official, don't be afraid to drop a few dollars into his campaign if you can spare it.

Good work to everyone who helped his campaign along the road so far. It's great that everyone's hard work has resulted in a progressive candidate progressive people can vote for.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

The Nader Argument Surfaces Again In Regards to Fitrakis

Since Al Gore has released a movie about global warming, two hours of telling us what we already know, the Democrats are now just a little bit angrier that they could have had a reasonable person in the White House.

Forget the fact that Al Gore, as Vice-President, did very little to solve the problem when he actually had the President's ear. Forget the fact that that he couldn't out-smart one of our simpler presidents.

It's all Nader's fault. Keep saying that if that is what you have to believe to sleep at night.

People can point out differences between Nader and your run of the mill Democrat all day and it doesn't matter. Democrats close their ears when people show the daily sell-outs and abandonment of party philosophy by their elected officials. They don't care that Democratic wheels get greased by the same corporations that fund Republican campaigns (Ted Strickland IS receiving more money from big business than Blackwell). Democrats, and perhaps partisan people in general, don't care a lick for ANYTHING that doesn't advance the cause of their precious party. People who identify with a party, upon joining, have accepted the belief that their party is the best thing for the country and will not listen to anything to the contrary, no matter how convincing.

A few Ohio Democrats in the blogosphere realize they have at least a relatively conservative candidate. They're saying things like "hey, we're not going to agree with candidates on everything, but we'll still vote for him because he might win." Strickland will get their votes in spite of his spotty environmental record, his anti-gay position (just said no to domestic partner benefits), his love of guns, and the fact that big business is funding his campaign. And if he loses, it's not his fault for abandoning the values of his party, it's Nade... Fitrakis' fault.

Some are really heating up the anti-third party candidate rhetoric. Most likely because they know Fitrakis is a better candidate--Democrats love to blame everything and everyone but themselves for losses. Speaking of which, do we ever hear Republicans still bashing Ross Perot or Pat Buchanan for having the audacity to run for office? Maybe I just don't pay attention to conservative punditry, but it could just be that they're not as tyrannical when it comes to which citizens gets to run for office. Heck, a lot of them even helped Ralph Nader get on the ballot (they must really love more voices and more choices).

JeanLR over at BSB answered the Nader-bashers well:

There is a "special level of hell"? "morons"? yeah, that's very helpful.

I won't launch into a history lesson here, but I will say it's high time that honest people took responsibility for what they did and what they left undone. It wasn't Nader that made what should have been a run-away win by Al Gore into a fiasco; and it wasn't Nader's fault that Al Gore's lawyers couldn't argue thier way out of a wet paper bag. Read Vincent Bugliosi's book "The Betrayal of America" for a concise critique of the very sad case brought by Al Gore's team in front of that Supreme Court. At the very least History would have recorded a dignified stand against this coup, instead we have the whitewash of "the system worked" bullsht. The prosecutors in the OJ Simpson trial presented the only worse case.

It is not Nader's fault that so many democrats rolled over and voted in favor of the very Supreme court justices that brought us Bush!!! It's not Nader's fault that all those democrats rolled over time and again voting for the "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" Act of 2001', and to approve sweeping war powers to this dubiously elected president.

It wasn't Nader that put Bush in power, it wasn't Nader that gave him those powers, abrogating thier own duties as a Congress to declare war and uphold the Constituion.

OK? so time to move on. This Fritakis guy, more power to him, the more freedom of expression the better. This is about our country and our heritage and our values and our ideals, not about politics. It's about principles~ the sooner democrats learn to speak from the heart~ with passion, not with the ususal pandering, intelligence-insulting bullsht~ the better.

Ohio Democrats, Cowardly as Usual

THEOcracy exposes Ohio Democrats cowardice:

Even more distressing - fourteen Democratic senators, including Harry Reid and Diane Feinstein, are voting for this.
You’d assume this would be a litmus test for who has common sense in Congress and who doesn’t. (Maybe it is, the more I think about it). Here’s how the House representatives in Ohio voted when it was passed in 2005:

• Rep. John Boehner (R-8) Y
• Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-13) Y
• Rep. Steve Chabot (R-1) Y
• Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-5) Y
• Rep. David Hobson (R-7) Y
• Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-9) Y
• Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-10) N
• Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-14) Y
• Rep. Bob Ney (R-18) NV
• Rep. Michael Oxley (R-4) NV
• Rep. Deborah Pryce (R-15) Y
• Rep. Ralph Regula (R-16) Y
• Rep. Tim Ryan (D-17) N
• Rep. Ted Strickland (D-6) Y
• Rep. Patrick Tiberi (R-12) Y
• Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-11) N
• Rep. Michael Turner (R-3) Y

Yup, there’s Sherrod Brown and Ted Strickland, our “hopefuls” for the Ohio senate and governorship.
Pretty fucking depressing.


I understand the disappointment but have grown used to cowardly Democrats who fear politics to the point they can't stand up for our most basic of civil liberties.

Perhaps if Democrats keep displaying such stupidity and fear, and we keep talking about it on here, people will stop wasting their votes on these clowns and seek someone who actually votes on principle or, as Theo calls it, common sense.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Close Call on Flag-burning Amendment

One vote is all that saved our freedom of speech in a highly political battle between anti flag-burners and those who apparently love to torch the Stars and Stripes.

We're getting dangerously close to not just ignoring the Bill of Rights, but actually running it through the shredder.

And the quote that sums the issue up nicely:

Opponents of the amendment, most of them Democrats, criticized the vote's timing and the fact it was being held at all. They countered that there are only a handful of reported flag burnings each year and that curtailing forms of unpopular political expression actually undermines the values for which the flag stands.


Good thing this didn't become part of our Constitution. If it had, I would have had to take up a new hobby: Burning flags every day in public places.

People have become so cavalier with our Constitutions these days. Gambling doesn't belong in our state Constitution and a contradiction doesn't belong in our federal. Stop playing partisan games with our supreme law.

Cincinnati Should Buy an MLS Team

An e-mail I just sent to our city council

Cincinnati Should Buy an MLS Team

The Cincinnati taxpayer is no stranger to being held for ransom by sports teams for exorbitant amounts of money. In recent memory, the taxpayer was willing or forced, depending on your perspective, to fund the creation of two incredibly beautiful, though slightly wasteful, stadiums on our Cincinnati Riverfront. Sports franchises blackmailing cities like Cincinnati is commonplace in the shady dealings of the sports world these days.

With almost some certainty both the Reds and the Bengals will one day want more money, stadium upgrades, or some other accommodation to continue to grace our city with their presence. We will then be forced to pay millions, or billions perhaps, to continue to support the teams we love and pass that love on to further generations. Most likely voters will be willing to do anything to keep these teams in their home because sports give people pride in their city and a sense of enthusiasm for where they live. In the best of conditions, sports teams who benefit from the taxpayer also make it a point to give back to the taxpayer as a way of showing appreciation. More and more we see sports teams care less about their civic role and more for their bottom line profit that results in bad deals for the same taxpayers who flood their stadium and dawn their overpriced jerseys.

There is a seldom discussed solution to this type of shady business dealing. It occurs to me every time I look at the architecturally magnificent Paul Brown Stadium: Fan ownership of sports franchises. Such an idea is difficult to execute with an MLB or NFL team because the "good ol' boy ownership network" has feared fan ownership for quite some time and attempts to make it an impossibility -- they don't want to cut themselves out of their cash cow.

But such an outside of the box idea (fan-ownership) is entirely possible with a fresh league like Major League Soccer -- a league and a sport that is quickly blossoming in our country (despite our country's poor performance in the world cup). As Cincinnati looks at creating a new budget and searches for ways to increase revenue, we should look into one possible creative solution: A fan-owned Major League Soccer team.

Let me highlight a few of the reasons why a fan-owned MLS team would be good for Cincinnati:

1) Paul Brown Stadium is capable of handling the franchise. Taxpayers already paid for the stadium and most people can't even afford to go to one of the 8 games a year. A Major League Soccer team would help us squeeze more money out of this huge investment and give people a chance to spend more time in the stadium that they built.

2) MLS tickets are affordable. More people could afford to attend soccer games than pricey football games.

3) As a city owned venture, many tickets could be given away to low-income families who otherwise couldn't afford to go or even our schools. Perhaps we could even give away tickets to students as an incentive to perform well at school and stay out of trouble (with a stadium that seats well over average MLS attendance it would be possible to sell tickets and also use many to do good things in the community).

4) Soccer is a sport that is adored by the entire planet. Adding the United States' highest level of soccer to our city would be another attractive incentive to inspire immigration from foreign countries and Americans from other states who love soccer (I've heard we're having trouble attracting people to live here). Teams from Europe regularly come to America to compete against the MLS and these events get international publicity.

5) Columbus, Ohio has had a very successful MLS franchise, proving the sport is marketable in Ohio. Aside from that, having a team right up I-71, we would have a built in, healthy rivalry.

6) This is a way to better use our downtown resources (PBS) to encourage people to spend money downtown. Local businesses would always appreciate another reason for people to spend time in the city and with the Banks Projects still a possibility, a soccer team is more reason to buy an expensive condo on the river.

7) An MLS team owned by the city could generate money for the city. If it's been profitable for private owners, it will be profitable for the citizens as owners. The league experiences regular expansion so it is only logical to assume someone's making money. Why not put that money into the city treasury instead of a private citizen's pocket?

The bottom line is that taxpayers paid through the nose to fund a stadium that is used 8 times a year. Adding an MLS team (cheap in comparison to other sports) will significantly increase the bang for our buck while providing all the benefits and more listed above.

With fan-based ownership, aside from creating another stream of revenue for our city, we will never have to worry that the team will leave the city that built it. We will never be held hostage by private ownership again. Our investment into the team will result in pure profit for our city, not profit for private interests.

In short, this modest proposal just can't lose.

If you want to read more about fan ownership, visit the New Rules Organization at this link: New Rules

Monday, June 26, 2006

One Reader Reacts to Desdemona

Cincinnati is looking for responses to Desdemona thanks to the lack of media coverage. I couldn't make it there so I don't have one. Kelly, fresh from Europe, has her thoughts though, and some pictures:

i went to the festival aware of my own biases about cincinnati i was bringing, and tried very hard to let them fall to the wayside and simply enjoy the music. these biases include having been elsewhere than america for the last several years, and the complex range of culture shock that is still settling in after coming back. and i was pleasantly surprised. the stills were fantastic, as well as rogue wave (despite some major technical difficulties). it was nice to see several canadian bands out, including the small sins. they enjoyed the fervor of one single fan rocking out right in front of the stage while everyone else sat mildly in the crowd, even when a band member brought his tambourine with him running up and down the stairs, trying to invoke audience participation. personal note: their drummer lives down the street from my brother (it's a small world in canada). all in all it was a very tame, relatively small but not too small, young crowd. paper airplanes was the only semi-local band that played sunday as far as i know, and they put on a really great set. what might have been slightly disconcerting to them were the two youngsters in their sporting goods chairs set up right in front of the stage, sipping water retrieved from their cupholders. who knows, maybe they were family members. one of the headlining bands, the fiery furnaces, are great performance artists even though i don't quite connect with the music. before the last act played, nick spencer came out on stage to thank everyone and to let everyone know how difficult it was to make the festival happen. he sounded tired but proud of his accomplishment, calling for the crowd to go buy more beer ("drink that shit!") so that he could break even. the most honest moment, perhaps, of the whole evening, was when the lead singer from the stills said, "Cincinnati freaks the hell out of me." i am convinced he meant it in the best, most innocent quebecois way, and it somehow echoes what i was feeling the whole time perfectly.


Democratic Plan for Success: Be More Republican

Whether it's Ohio Democrats like Ted Strickland who could have been a Republicans all along, or long time Republicans joining the rank and file of Democratic Party of Kansas, it's becoming more clear that progressivism is being shoved into the back seat.

The two-storey office block is Parkinson's campaign headquarters as he runs as Democrat candidate for deputy governor. So far, so normal. Except that only a few weeks ago Parkinson was a Republican. In fact, he was Kansas Republican party chairman.

His defection to the Democrats sent shockwaves through a state deeply associated with the national Republican cause and the evangelical conservatives at its base.


Some Democrats are bound to see this as a good thing: A chance to remove the neo-cons from control. But as this becomes more common, our only choices will be a bunch of cons.

At least there is always the Green Party and candidates like Bob Fitrakis who are still rooted in progressivism. People are bound to be criticized for voting for such parties and candidates, since voting for people whom you agree with is apparently somehow wrong, but I can't help but think about those people in Kansas who literally have to choose between two different Republicans.

And to Democrats I just sound like a crazy idealist because their new deal is all about "the party," but those are just the blinders they wear throughout these political horse races. Win the race, think about nothing else. They're already getting angry at Fitrakis for stealing progressive votes. But logically, isn't it Strickland, who is not progressive, that is stealing "progressive" votes that are cast for him only because he wears the label that FDR, a progressive, made successful?

Don't think about that Democrats, just keep reaffirming the mantra that the party comes above all things. Including logic and principle.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Local Festival Snubs Local Talent

It's hard to determine the impact of Des Fest. Cincinnatians have been told by promoter Nick Spencer that this is an event designed to help our city, but at every turn, there seems to be another snag and more negative press. It's a shame considering the festival, in theory, is a great thing.

First, the festival triggered a fight with the city. A showdown between the indy rock world and our city council that is notorious for a lack of vision.

Now it's triggered a fight between the festival and one of Cincinnati's most popular local bands, the Sundresses. It's sad to see that this festival, designed to promote culture and music in Cincinnati, is treating its Cincinnati artists with such disrespect.

The bad news associated with the planning and execution of this festival has risen to the surface. Hopefully some good news will rise to the top after the weekend. But the Cincinnati music scene is bound to have a poor taste in its mouth with press releases like this floating around:

No agreement or details were given regarding payment. We would have played for FREE if we had been approached in a manner that suggested Desdemona wanted us to perform. Something like, “Hi Sundresses, we’re really trying to start something great here in Cincinnati with the Desdemona festival and we really want you to perform. We may not be able to pay you, but we like your music and want to give you the opportunity to be a part of what we think is going to be something really special.” Something along those lines would have worked, but that never happened. When I asked Nick Spencer to tell me why The Sundresses should play Desdemona, his response was (with a tone of indignity), “Well, if you dont wanna play, just don’t play.” Well, fine, if we’re not worth YOUR time, you’re not worth OURS, Nick.

Cincinnati Still Scratching its Head Over Population Loss

The Enquirer is still buzzing with talk about why people are leaving Cincinnati. The popular opinion still seems to be that crime, real or perceived, is the driving force behind our dwindling population.

That's just not the case.

You look around the country at the success of big cities and they're not thriving because they are "safe." They're thriving because they embrace what urban life is about. If people want pure safety and pure conformity, they're going to move to the suburbs. The city just can't match that sense of calm one finds in the burbs and it shouldn't try to. People don't live in NYC, LA, Chicago, Portland, Seattle, or Miami for the sense of "calm."

Cincinnati has culture. There's no denying that. But instead of embracing Cincinnati, our elected officials keep telling us how bad it is and Peter Bronson keeps telling us that black people are just sitting around waiting to kill suburbanites (hyperbole).

Don't take taxpayer money and hire more cops. That's a misdirected effort. Build a transit system, give us community wi-fi, support events like Desdemona, subsizide small businesses, overall, just make it easier for people to enjoy what they come to the city to experience.

Ultimately, the more business you create and the more population you attract to the city with needed amenities, the more money you'll have to make the schools better and more creative than they already are and the police department better equipped to do their job.

Just once I would like to see council come up with something other than "more cops" to cure our ailing city. There are better ways if only someone had the will to explore them.

Saturday, June 24, 2006

Too funny not to post

Via Andrew Sullivan:



Though it's been said many times, you just can't help but wonder how this commercial got the green light.

Big Money Campaigns Seek to Hijack Blogs

Reports of Ohio Learn and Earn's campaign and their continued lying are a widespread epidemic. Bloggers continue to pop up with stories about dishonest petition gatherers asking for help to create scholarships for Tiny Tim while the mere mention of slot machines is too much to ask for.

If bloggers are anything, we are perceptive. That's why campaigns are wasting their money when they buy on-line spin doctors like Todd Hoffman, Ohio Learn and Earn's "Director of Online Communications."

I find it personally insulting, and I think many other bloggers will as well, that these hacks continue to sell us the same old BS:

From a comment in the Clark Street Blog:

The petitioners are instructed to provide information to where the funding is coming from. It is in their training. If they are not, they are doing so in violation of our policy and this will be dealt with. I have spoke with our field staff managers and they are addressing the issue by reinforcing the policy of openness and retraining the petitioners.

If you hear of more accounts similar to these cases, email me at todd.hoffman@ohiolearnandearn.com.


Thanks,
Todd Hoffman
Director of Online Communications
Ohio Learn and Earn


This story might work for the average Joe who's not reading the blogs, but it's downright moronic to think that people who pay attention on a daily basis are going to fall for this "isolated incident" line. It's happening in every part of the state and the conversations are almost verbatim. It's not a coincidence.

Even if you want to give this campaign the benefit of the doubt, what's their track record on honesty? Their website features babies and children as the banner, gambling gets a few sentence mention buried in the pages of their site, and their Craig's List ads seeking petition gatherers reads like this:

This summer, work to make college education a reality for ALL Ohio student. Ohio Learn and Earn is working to establish a billion dollar scholarship fund. We're hiring outreach staff to gather half a million petition signatures state-wide by the end of the summer.


In case you missed it, that is again a complete omission of gambling. Most of us will agree a lie of omission is as good as a standard lie (think of the husband or wife who just doesn't tell their spouse they are having an affair). This campaign knows gambling will lose so they are banking on the fact that Ohio voters are too stupid to figure out their campaign is merely a beautiful house of cards.

Not only are they preying on the average voter, who doesn't take the time to look into every ballot initiative in excruciating detail, they are hoping to prey upon bloggers. Bloggers, and I am guilty of this myself at times, tend to blush and take their foot of the throttle when a campaign contacts them or looks in their direction after weeks of pointed and accurate criticism. A phone call, a series of e-mails, or perhaps a sit-down with "Meet the Bloggers," they're all efforts to silence us with love. A sense of validation is a bloggers downfall, at least that's what they think.

Todd Hoffman is just one of the many big campaign lackeys invading the blogosphere, attempting to "shape the conversation." Big media, the other conglomeration with a lot to lose as blogs become more powerful, is abandoning print and putting more emphasis on their "blogs," which aren't even really blogs, but a section of their newspaper that looks like a blog. They (and I use the Enquirer Politics Blog as my basis) don't interact with other local blogs or link to hot stories, they steal them and make money from their increased page hits.

Be wary of the Todd Hoffmans, paid liars of the world sent to control the blossoming political discussion with insulting lies.

Smoke Free Ohio

Smoke Free Ohio still needs quite a few signatures to get on the ballot in the fall. Big tobacco is doing everything in its power to take the choice out of the voters' hands. Big surprise.

I am going to help out with the signature effort and I hope that if this is an important issue for you as well, you will do the same.

Please e-mail me if you are interested in joining our team. If you want to work solo, click here to print petitions. Make sure to read the directions, they've already thrown out a disgusting number of signatures over ridiculous technicalities.

Thanks for the help. I look forward to hearing from those of you who want to get involved with the AndrewWarner.org team.

Keep Progressive Radio Alive in Cincinnati

By Chad Edwards of the Appalachian Greens Blog:

Per request by the kick-ass blogger Jenny from Donkey O.D..

"Save WCKY's Progressive Talk Format! The word is out that WCKY 1530 AM, "The Revolution of Talk Radio" is up on the chopping block if listenership does not increase. We think it is imperative for democracy's sake that greater Cincinnati have a progressive voice on the airwaves. This petition is an effort to show Clear Channel that we ARE listening. Please join us in asking WCKY to continue with it's progressive talk programming."

If you agree with the above, please sign the petitition below to keep progressive radio in the Hillbilly Capital known as Cincinnati, Ohio. Don't let Clear Channel ruin radio anymore than they already have.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/251565251

Friday, June 23, 2006

Unlucky #13

Only 13 of our Senators are reasonable enough to recognize it is time to end the war. Not even now, but in July of 2007.

When I see a vote like this 86-13 vote, I am reaffirmed in my belief that our elected officials care nothing for representing the people that elected them. If we were to take a straw poll of United States citizens we would find a drastically different number.

That is what we call the "democracy divide."

At least there are 13 Senators who actually listen and feel the pulse of us citizens.

Along with Russ Feingold and John Kerry who proposed the legislation, these Senators were brave enough to say that the war is over and our objectives have been accomplished. Make no mistake about it, when there are people like Karl Rove waiting to show the world you are a "coward," this is not an easy vote to cast. These Senators were brave, if only for one vote:

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI)
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), co-sponsor
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Sen. James Jeffords (I-VT)
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), co-sponsor
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Leslie Ghiz Ruffled Some Feathers With Her Rude Behavior

I'm glad I'm not the only one who was bothered by Leslie Ghiz's nose being buried in her two-way at today's council meeting. Monica, of the Cincinnati Black Blog, took issue with it as well.

As a result, The Dean of Cincinnati is calling for action.

Follow the link and send the e-mail. Demand respect from those who represent us.

Wednesday Council Roundup

If you don't get down to council meetings on a regular basis, as I don't, you can forget how incompetent our officials really are. Today I was able to listen to council "debate" the upcoming budget.

The big topic of the day, and council's creative answer to solving crime, should we add 100 more cops? John Cranley, who seems to be the biggest enthusiast of the idea, consistently pointed to cities like New York who have "cleaned up" their streets with large scale arrests and a massive police force. Six other council members agreed with him. The only dissenting voice was David Crowley who preached more efficiency as compared to bulking up the force with larger amounts of officers. He too pointed to a comparison between Cincinnati and New York, a statistic that showed New York has about 10% more of their force available to respond to calls and fewer officers behind desks (or in other fields of police work).

After the rest of council vigorously jumped on the "tough on crime" bandwagon, some, such as Jeff Berding, pointed out there were many other areas in which crime can be fought (education, recreation, job opportunities, etc). However, no one really seemed anxious to explore these routes. With the urban flight news article coming out in today's Enquirer (how convenient by the way), everyone wanted to talk about the importance of safety and, of course, "perceived safety."

The next issue to be "debated": The scheduled property tax roll back. Taking their cue at the words "tax rollback," Republicans Chris Monzel and Leslie Ghiz leapt at the chance to valiantly fight for property owners rights. The cut, which would remove $2,000,000 of the city's budget, ironically the same two council members had just voted to increase spending, would cost the average property owner $9 a year. Monzel even went as far to infer that this $9 is one of the main reasons people are leaving the city for the suburbs. Ghiz advocated the rollback as an excuse for the city to get used to a little belt-tightening, complaining that the city is too frivolous with taxpayer money. Again, right after she voted for a raise in safety spending. The only dissenting votes on this issue were Crowley and Thomas who saw the apparent discrepancy in demanding for more police and better city services while simultaneously cutting the budget.

That brings me to the AndrewWarner.org hero of the day, David Crowley. The only voice on council who realizes that throwing police at crime is not the best solution. In spite of him losing that argument to those police grandstanders, he, along with Cecil Thomas, could at least recognize the need to not eliminate money from the budget while trying to provide better city services. Aside from that, he reminded Mayor Mallory, and those in attendance, of the need to create a clean environment department at city hall. Not to mention his amendment to save the Department of Human Services. Way to go Councilman Crowley.

The AndrewWarner.org loser of the day, hands down, has to go to Leslie Ghiz. Not only did her votes and speeches contradict one another, she was text messaging on her Blackberry the entire time. Throughout the session she was smiling and staring down at her portable device like a college girl who had just met "the one" at a frat party and couldn't bear to not talk to him for a couple hours. If she wants to be horrendously rude, she can do it on her own time. It was especially distracting due to the interference of every incoming and outgoing message in her microphone. That buzzing sound through the PA is so annoying.

United States: "Star Wars" Shields Up

North Korea's missile capabilities have caused us to activate our missile defense system:

America has activated its multi-billion-dollar missile defence shield for the first time, it emerged yesterday, as concern mounted that North Korea was preparing to launch a long-range ballistic missile.

With a typical blast of fiery rhetoric, the Marxist regime suggested it had no intention of backing down over what would be its most bellicose step in eight years, saying it was not bound by a four-year moratorium on missile tests.


And how effective is it?

In eight tests the mock incoming missile has been hit five times. The tests went on hold last year when interceptors did not leave their silos as intended.


These are scary times.

Not Just a Location, Suburbs Are a Way of Life, a State of Mind

It seems reasonable for young parents, still only a few years into their relationship and expecting their first child, to look to their future and find the safest home that will lead to a positive education (both in school and out of school) of their children.

In this regard, the well trimmed lawns paving the way to new, often large, homes in the suburbs can seem more inviting than the concrete jungle that surrounds most of the city. I can imagine that it is assuring for people, as it was for my parents, to unleash their kids into the wild, when they get to the appropriate age of course, and know they won't run into gunslinging thugs selling dope on a walk home from their best friends house. Knowing your child can study in the evening after a family dinner and not be interrupted by people yelling at one another outdoors or the pounding of subwoofers, I'm sure, is a warm feeling for uncertain and worrisome parents.

So why then, does anyone, choose to live in the urbs? A lot of people don't, they're just stuck here. Others come to seek culture and diversity (something I was told in my 99% white high school is a good thing) on their quest to enlightenment.

One hundred years ago, so I'm told, there really were no suburbs. There was city life, powered by a strong manufacturing base, and rural life. All colors of people, whether they liked it or not, were forced to live amongst one another and sort things out, as best as they could at least. There were conflicts of course, but the Civil Rights movements and the progress made towards racial healing, as little as it may be, I would argue, comes from us living with one another, suffering the same conditions and enjoying the same victories.

Obviously, our conflicts have never been totally resolved and that has left us with the divided America we continue to live in today. The once booming cities, of the Midwest especially, are being abandoned for greener pastures and safer havens.

There was a point where tagging stopped being art and started being graffiti, skateboarding became a nuisance and not a hobby or a mode of transportation, and uniformity became the new style.

It goes without say that there are benefits to the city that those who leave feel are expendable. Using Cincinnati as an example, if you're in the city you're in the proximity of culture hotspots, whether it be Music Hall, art galleries, the MLB, the University of Cincinnati, or the NFL. This is the attraction for young people, empty nesters, artists, or as this large group of people has been clumped together is often called, "the Creative Class." The Creative Class theory, attracting such people, isn't complete though. People should have the choice to be creative and have a family, as well as raise their family in the city in a solid school.

In today's Cincinnati Enquirer a handful of people who are leaving the city, discussed another staple of the city, the idea of diversity:

"But a bigger house doesn't leave us with much to pay for school, and I really don't think Cincinnati Public is cutting it right now. I don't want to raise my daughter in a neighborhood that isn't diverse. But all things considered, that's something she'll learn later," Hauser said.


Nevermind the multiple schools that achieve great things in Cincinnati and continue to innovate the education process, what is important to realize is that "diversity," as a value, is something that people are willing to sacrifice in exchange for a bigger house. Cincinnati, perhaps not the best example because it is black and white, lacking further diversity, pales in comparison when put next to San Francisco or bigger cities across the country. Other cities have China town, a vibrant Latino community (we have a growing community, but still quite small in comparison), and assorted other communities. I don't think giving this up for suburbia is an isolated incident with Mr. Hauser, this is an epidemic of the society in which we live.

The real bad news about all of this is that those who have a little bit of money in the bank, or have built up a good credit score, are able to pick and choose which size house they want and where they want it. The people who live check to check are stuck in their apartments in the city, or wherever they may be, no matter how bad the situation is. This has left our cities disproportionately poor and city services, schools for one, are drastically underfunded.

And everyone's hands are tied. The city is being held for ransom by those who use their personal freedom to live elsewhere. Green space is being overtaken by strip malls and houses sit empty in the city while new ones are built far away from the perceived danger of the urban core.

Ultimately, the social fabric of our society is being torn apart by the rise of the suburbs. Different races and cultures are losing touch with one another which leads to an increase in hate, or as the Cincinnati Blog might call it, "bigotry." One class is settling into a comfortable new life, while their gains indirectly lead to a suffering of the under class of America.

Conformity is cherished, while diversity is expendable. America will be defined by the Gap, short hair, and yes, 2 point whatever kids and a "happy," "normal," marriage.

Personal choice is a wonderful thing and I respect the right of people to live their life the way they choose, but I would hope people would begin to remember the simple fact that we are all connected. Every time someone develops a new area, that is more natural space gone. Every time someone takes their tax money out of the Cincinnati (or whatever city) school system because the schools are underfunded, the schools lose more money and more children are "left behind."

Like so many things, I suppose this just comes down to whether we want to look out for ourselves and our family unit, or the society and the people who are a part of it. Do we want to live with one another and learn to treat each other with dignity, or do we want to segregate and colonize?

These are the choices that will define us in history books.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Despicable and Disgusting

From the New York Times:

According to Reuters, an Iraqi military official, Major General Abdul Aziz Mohammed, said in Baghdad that the two bodies had marks showing that "they had been tortured in a barbaric fashion."


Torture is never an appropriate course of action.



These men, all men, deserve better than the treatment they received at the hands of their enemy.

When will this shit be over?

South Dakota's not South Dakota yet?

Ohio recently squashed a restrictive abortion ban, prompting me to proudly proclaim Ohio's not South Dakota yet.

Now it's unclear as to whether South Dakota is going to be South Dakota (the leading anti-choice state in the Union). The voters of the great state of South Dakota are going to decide whether or not to scrap their controversial abortion bill this fall.

There's a lot to pay attention to this fall and this will certainly be one of the most controversial votes. Is the heartland still standing strong by their evangelical agenda or is reason and an attention to the Constitution going to come back in style?

We'll know soon enough. At this point, I'm still a little scared to hear the answer.

Fitrakis, Sticking it to the Man

The Cincinnati Beacon is unrolling a multi-part video series with Green candidate for Governor, Bob Fitrakis.

Fitrakis, aside from being a bit of an academic elitist, is spot on as usual.

The Dean of Cincinnati has contacted the Cincinnati Enquirer to seek further clarification about their reasons for not covering the stolen election of 2004. In response, radio silence.

This is definitely a must read/must see.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Guns: Constitutional or Cultural

Here we are in a "swing state," stuck with two candidates who are on the same side of a crucial debate.The gun debate.

Ted Strickland, a product of the rural southeast and Republican Lite, is taking the GOP to task for not putting more guns in the hands of Ohioans. Strickland released a press release in an attempt to encourage more people to carry concealed weapons.

"As governor, I would support passage of this bill in its entirety and would sign H.B. 347 into law the moment it hit my desk,'' Strickland said in the press release.

...These are places full of conservative, Republican-leaning voters - the same kind Strickland has depended on in his southeast Ohio congressional campaigns - who might well appreciate a gubernatorial candidate eager to protect their 2nd Amendment rights.


Now it's true, Ted Strickland has depended on Republican voters his entire career, because hey, he pretty much is one, but is he really "eager to protect [our] 2nd Amendment rights"?

The writing on the Enquirer blog, and many gun supporters, argue as if the 2nd Amendment is clear and the issue has been decided upon by law experts across the country.

In reality, it may be the murkiest water in the Bill of Rights. The text of the Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Interpretation from FindLaw:

The opposing theories, perhaps oversimplified, are an ''individual rights'' thesis whereby individuals are protected in ownership, possession, and transportation, and a ''states' rights'' thesis whereby it is said the purpose of the clause is to protect the States in their authority to maintain formal, organized militia units.


If I were to offer my interpretation, I would lean towards the latter, in which the Amendment calls for the right to a well-organized militia, but that's an argument where the differing opinions may never agree.

I personally have lived in a neighborhood where guns weren't an issue one way or another. I've also lived in a city where it seems as if there are daily killings that never lack the involvement of a smoking gun.

To me, it seems more important to reduce or eliminate lives lost by guns then to make sure the good ol' boys can take their artillery out and take aim at defenseless animals.

Neither major party candidate seems to agree. The Democratic constituency, so thirsty for a victory, won't abandon their great white hope over a petty issue like a crucial part of the party platform. But that's to be expected after such a long drought.

Let's not paint either side of this debate as people who fight for our civil rights. When both sides are correct, in their own way, it makes finger pointing rather useless.

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Legislators Finally Debating Iraq

Perhaps years too late, the war, and our occupation of Iraq, is finally being openly debated.

The country, operating in a state of panic after 9/11, was willing to follow anyone who slightly appeared to be leading. Sadly, the only "leader" in sight was George Bush and the members of congress who feared his soaring popularity rating. For reasons we may never know, he led us towards a war against an abstract idea, instead of a tangible opponent, and we are given no reason to think it will ever be over.

I've been watching the news clips about this "debate" the last few days with little to say on the issue, as it was entirely too predictable. This debate, instead of being a starting point to stop the killing, is being used for political leverage and future TV commercials.

This guy won't stand up to terrorism, this guy follows an incorrect President, she's a crazy San Francisco Democrat who, because her city accepts gay people, must be out of touch with reality and "the heartland"... We've heard it all, and we're going to hear the same battle cries until November.

Thinking about all those who have paid for this war with their lives, and then watching the partisan bickering in our legislature, is saddening to say the least. Results will always trump rhetoric.

At least some Democrats are finding their voice by now, even if it is just because peace is becoming politically popular. If Democratic and progressive voters have wised up by now, we will respond. We will listen carefully and choose the candidates who say and do the right thing, not choose based on who has been married to a popular president.

Politicians, in contrast to us "normal" people I think, don't realize how disturbing it is to play these political games with the lives of Americans and Iraqis alike. If there is not going to be no deadline to pull troops out of the area (as there should be), then set an objective so we know what we're waiting for.

"Defeating terror" doesn't count.

Soldiers Abandon Unjust War, Seek Refuge in Canada

Depending on who writes the history books, these soldiers will either be portrayed as heroes willing to fight injustice, or cowards who abandoned the front lines of the "war on terror."

These soldiers who have left Iraq for our neighbor to the north are not "draft dodgers" or cowards. They are decorated veterans, young men with purple hearts and scarred memories filled with deaths they don't understand.

What do these soldiers, now seeking refuge in Canada, have to say about the war and their critics?:

"When I was in Iraq, we were killing innocent people for oil. It was obvious they didn't want us there," said Anderson, 24, who is petitioning to remain in Canada.


Another soldier had this to say:

"They say we're traitors, we're deserters," said former Marine Chris Magaoay, 20, of the Hawaiian island of Maui. "No, I'm a Marine and I stand up for what I believe in, and I believe the Constitution of the United States of America is being pushed aside as a scrap piece of paper."


And of course, Cindy Sheehan:

"They're moral human beings who don't want to go to Iraq and kill innocent people to line the pockets of George Bush and the war machine," she said.


We all have a general idea of how the military works: Once the contract is signed your life becomes one of the many tools they use to accomplish their bidding (much like a deal with the devil). I was beginning to wonder if there were going to be any soldiers brave enough (not to say those who are fighting are not brave) to lay down their guns and refuse to participate in this baffling war, a war that confuses the public with its uncertainty of purpose.

It takes a special kind of person to sacrifice what these soldiers are sacrificing in the name of justice. They are forced to leave the country that they love, so much so that at some point signed up to fight for it, their families, their friends, their fellow soldiers, and any other remnants of the lives they have built. And it is more than likely that these young men will be criticized, unjustly, for their decision.

Here's hoping that these men will be remembered for their bravery in the face of adversity. It takes a lot of chutzpah to tell your government that they are wrong, even an incredibly corrupt one like our own, and we should embrace their efforts as an act of courage, not one of cowardice.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Colbert Exposes the Republican Intelligence on The Hill

Stephen Colbert asks the "do-nothingest" member of Congress about the Ten Commandments, balancing the budget, and his insecure masculinity. A must see!

Go United States!

It was heartbreaking to see the United States stumble out of the gates to an embarrassing 3-0 loss to the Czech Republic in the 2006 world cup, but I can't help but think redemption is only a few hours away.

The World Cup, besides being the premier sporting event for the entire world, is significant to the international community in the same way as the Olympics, perhaps even more so. Through athletics the world is able to put our political struggles on hold, if just for a brief moment, and otherwise foreign countries can settle things on a sports field. And then they can shake hands like gentleman (and when females play, like ladies).

Tomorrow afternoon we face Italy, an ally in our suffering of the Iraqi war, but an opponent on the soccer field. I urge you, even if you do not consider yourself a fan of soccer, to become a part of the international community tomorrow and watch the game, wave a flag, and support your country and its athletes.

This year I was certain the United States would shock the world and take the tournament by the horns, but as we all saw, we fell flat the first time out. And now we have to defeat an international juggernaut (in soccer terms) to continue being a part of the most celebrated sporting event on Earth.

This game or any game, we must remember, isn't a war. It is a celebration of international unity and sportsmanship. More importantly perhaps, it is the celebration of our humanity and our similarities. Though sometimes sporting events appear to escalate conflicts more than give us resolution, there are often glimmering moments of hope that we can't ignore. Evidence that is stronger than words:



That picture (courtesy of Andrew Sullivan) of course is one of those "crazy, radical, Muslims from Iran." As Sullivan points out, she is not being forced to dress a certain way or having her arm twisted until she "acts like a lady." She is having fun, being herself, and displaying pride for her country.

Win or lose, we must be encouraged. If we can all meet and play soccer, I can only imagine the possibilities of seeking to further understand the different cultures of the world.

That being said... USA! USA! USA!

Catch the United States vs Italy on ABC at 2:30 EST.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Learn and Earn's New Campaign Video

In case you didn't notice, Learn and Earn loves to show pictures of happy children in support of their gambling campaign. This video puts their whole campaign together nicely. I found it on YouTube and thought they could put some good music in the background and put it up on their front page.

Learn and Earn a Despicable Campaign

Who would have thought an amendment for slot machine gambling in smoke filled race tracks would plaster children all over their website?

Of course they are kind enough to omit the truth when collecting signatures as well, telling college students it is for a scholarship fund while omitting the way they will fill it.

And in their most recent stunt they used underhanded techniques to eliminate their competition from the south.

What other dirty tricks can they pull in route exploiting the poor and creating another addiction?

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Mormons Prove Their Hypocrisy One More Time

My freshman year of college was spent as a philosophy major at a state school. In that brief year I had the opportunity of reading a myriad of history's greatest thinkers, debating with my classmates and my professor, and exposing my young mind to thoughts vastly different than my own -- the very essence of a philosophy program.

Some of those great minds that I had the opportunity to read were Catholic, others worshipped multiple gods, others still worshipped no god at all. This type of diversity, so crucial in an academic setting, helped my mind become the intellectual juggernaut it is today.

While I left the field of philosophy, arguing in circles gets very tiring, I try to remember to fill my mind with thoughts that are different from my own, even if just to further know my "enemy." That is why I was crushed to hear that Brigham Young University, a Mormom breeding ground for anti-intellectualism, fired a professor of philosophy for speaking out against the Federal Marriage amendment, an amendment which would add another scar of discrimination into our already disgusting history.

The professor's disagreement with the Church and their political action campaign didn't come in a classroom setting, but in an OP-ED piece for the Salt Lake Tribune. A piece, besides being beautifully written, that challenged the church and its not-so-honest approach to discussion and faith:

God is not the author of incoherence or injustice, but we humans often are. We in the LDS Church must be more honest about our history, including the past and future practice of polygamy in our official doctrine. This will be difficult, for it will reveal that we have been less than truthful in our public relations, and it will show our inconsistency with current statements opposing gay marriage.

We can no longer afford to teach only what is useful and hope people won't discover what is true. In this day of easy Internet access, a person can find more real history of the LDS Church in 30 minutes online than the same person would in a lifetime studying approved church materials.

This is not right. Too many individuals have suffered a loss of faith when they were forced to choose between the truth or their family after innocently discovering the discrepancy between genuine history and the official story of the church.

We need to trust the membership of the church and treat them as adults, as equals. We are a church of brothers and sisters, not one of the few privileged leaders and the many subordinate followers. There might be a diversity of roles and responsibilities from prophet to Sunday School teacher, but we are all peers with one another and equally irreplaceable in God's thoughts and affections.


This thought came on the heels of the church urging its members to encourage Senators to approve this constitutional amendment and preserve the church's narrow-minded view of what a family should be. A thought that would cost adjunct professor and LDS member Jeffrey Nielsen his job.

After being relieved of his duties, Nielsen wrote yet another beautiful appeal to his church and his university:

I fear for the church and the university if the time comes when the members of the church, including faculty at BYU, are not allowed to disagree, either in public or private, with political positions taken by the church. If such conformity is required, then we deserve to be called neither a church nor a university.

I also strongly disagree with the implications of your statement that faithfulness and loyalty to the church and church leaders never permits expressions of disagreement, or questioning of our church leaders - especially in an academic setting. Unquestioning acquiescence and blind loyalty to leaders in positions of power over human beings have no place in any institution of higher learning that values the pursuit of truth and search for justice. And in my mind, what is philosophy but the quest for truth and justice. I believe that there is great potential at BYU that will never be realized if the faculty, in certain areas of study, are limited in their research and work by the necessity of arriving at pre-approved answers given by church leaders.

Finally, when it comes to the sustaining of church leaders, I will always argue for the privilege of church members to examine, question, and dialogue with each other and with their leaders in order to genuinely sustain and support church doctrines and teachings. I do not believe that sustaining leaders requires either silent acquiescence or unquestioning conformity, but it does require active engagement with one another and with our church leaders, regardless of our place or position within church leadership hierarchies. If sustaining our leaders is to be real and genuine - not a sham as are elections in totalitarian governments - then members must be free to examine, question and benevolently criticize. Ultimately, I strongly believe that every person possesses the privilege to speak and the obligation to listen.


Ask a Mormon missionary any question and they will give you a canned answer. One such answer is that the church does not urge political action, only that it instills the morality in the individuals that compose the church and hopes that they will carry those into world. Quite a contrast from their actions: Urging members to contact Senators in support of political causes and firing church members who dare to seek truth.

It's bewildering that an accredited university is allowed to stifle academic freedom and free-flowing discussion. If i had the power I would remove their ability to call themselves a university and issue diplomas -- teaching church doctrine and church doctrine only does not equate to an education. Such a firing also begs other questions: Does their biology department not teach evolution? Does their anthropology department teach that man sprouted up in Missouri? Is "Darwin" a forbidden word?

Mormons will tell you their history if you're not the type to slam the door in the face of odd looking strangers. History, as they would present it, is a series of unfair events and an epic filled with struggles for their people. They walk around, given the right of free speech and religion by our country, and fill the ears of the vulnerable with their message of hope and hate, a hope in stripping other people of similar rights given by our country.

People didn't want to hear their message of lunacy so they drove them as far as Utah, which at the time was nothing but an open space. Now they have built up extravagant temples, buildings only privileged and well-behaved members may enter (because Jesus picks favorites), across the country, taking advantage of America's tolerance, and they stuff their wallets with a healthy tithe from the richest per capita religion in the country. As they preach their hatred and banish their members who dare appeal to reason, I can't help but wish they were driven much farther than Utah.

Andrew Sullivan said it best:

I am grateful for the man's sacrifice on behalf of others. History will vindicate his stand. And one day, I believe, churches will be ashamed of what they have said and done.

A Country Coming Together, Proof That Our Services are No Longer Wanted

As Americans living thousands of miles away from Iraq, it would be an impossibility, unless you are able to somehow sort out the conflicted reports of partisan politicians, to determine how our troops are truly viewed in Iraq.

That was until amnesty became an option for those who have attacked United States soldiers.

For some, this may incite anger. For others, it's a reality check. We've been told for too long that we are the great liberators and that only a handful of Iraqis have taken up arms against us. The fact of the matter is: Iraq is a wounded country, and at this point, we are the knife in the wound that needs to be removed so that healing can begin.

Whatever the administration's intentions were, be it the formation of a new democracy, more affordable oil, or vengeance on Dad's enemy; it's time to get out of the way so that the divided factions of this country can come together and form a unified nation.

It's time for us to give the citizens of Iraq some space. Their democracy is being smothered and it needs to breathe.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Is somebody listening?

On this blog I've been talking a lot about inclusiveness in the political process, even in regards to the smaller, usually forgotten candidates. Just the other day I wrote an open letter to all the campaigns for governor in Ohio. Of course, in the tradition of Democratic and Republican closed door democracy, neither major campaign responded, not even a "thanks for the interest" letter.

But someone's listening.

The Cincinnati Enquirer, on their front page, featured all 4 candidates' (yes, 4 candidates are on the ballot) pictures and their answers to a common question.

Not only did all four candidates get equal time on the front page, Jon Craig raised an important question on the Enquirer Politics Extra Blog:

If Blackwell and Strickland agree to agree, several Enquirer readers have asked if any groups are inviting Green Party candidate Bob Fitrakis or Libertarian Bill Peirce to any debates?


Great question Jon Craig. Who would have thought it would be the Cincinnati Enquirer, often lambasted for their erroneous or biased coverage, to provide in-depth coverage as well as shine the light of the mainstream media on the issue of our broken democracy (even if inadvertently).

It's sad that every election cycle we have to discuss whether or not certain candidates, candidates that have met the often ridiculous legal requirements for ballot access, should be included in the debates. It seems to me idiotic to claim to have a democracy while picking and choosing which candidates are worthy of being seen in the public. I thought letting the public decide who is worthy is the entire point of a representative democracy, but I digress.

The even greater tragedy may be that the two corporate candidates can't even figure out when and where to debate one another, maybe, by their own incompetence or the strangest brand of politics in recent memory, making inclusion a moot point. Is it really a discussion on whether or not the candidates for the highest office in our state are going to be able to have a discussion on the issues affecting our lives? I'd think a series of public debates throughout the state would be mandatory. After all, they are campaigning for a full time job, shouldn't we, their bosses, get a chance to hear their plans for our state? The way they keep throwing down challenges, and attempting to look bold when doing so, is ridiculous. You'd think they were doing us some type of favor by letting us hear their grand vision.

Our "democracy" may be in deeper trouble than I thought. Stolen elections and hotly contested races without debates? I don't think people in other democracies would believe this stuff even if we tried to explain. It's just that bewildering.

Ohio's not South Dakota Yet

Tom Brinkman's totalitarian abortion campaign fell flat on its face, Ken Blackwell, the darling of the evangelical right, is getting trampled in the polls, and even Sherrod Brown is standing up for what he believes in.

It's like Ohio, if just for a few days, has realized the Republican agenda is helping no one.

I've seen the right starting to tremble and the Democrats in the Ohio blogosphere are already holding their champagne glasses in anticipation, but I fear a strong dose of reality is lurking on the horizon.

Republicans will pass a more sensible abortion plan, something that will cut all the funding to precious organizations like Planned Parenthood. Then of course J. Kenneth Blackwell will somehow, in spite of all the polls saying otherwise, squeak out a victory for the Governorship of Ohio. Mike DeWine will win the all important battle of name recognition to secure his seat for one more term in the Senate.

After the astonishing defeat, Democrats will crawl back under their rock, scratch their heads and wonder, just as they did in 2004.

But that's just me thinking out loud. Ohio could be headed towards a blue future, or even a Green one (after all, Fitrakis did pull down a solid 1% in the poll), but I can't help but worry when the red team still counts the votes.